GLASS BOTTLE CONSULTATIVE FORUM

April 3, 2026

BACKGROUND

  • The Forum was set up by Dublin City Council in December 2024.
  • It is a forum for the mutual exchange of information between stakeholders associated with the Irish Glass Bottle site. (City Council, Area Committee, Area Office, Local Community, Local Residents, Developer, etc.) 
  • It provides a platform for local and stakeholder concerns to be discussed and resolved throughout all stages of the development.
  • The Forum is chaired by Cllr Danny Byrne and attendees include representatives from Sean Moore Rd RA, the IGB Housing Action Group, SAMRA, the Developer, local Councillors and DCC Executives.
  • 5 meetings have been held to date.


TOPICS INCLUDE

  • Compliance with the SDZ Planning Approval.
  • Updates on Housing from DCC including Social and Affordable allocations.
  • Updates from the Developer including progress to date and next stages.
  • Community issues and concerns.
  • The provision of Public Transport to the site including the Luas.
  • The re-design of Sean Moore Rd.


SOME SAMRA COMMENTS

  • SAMRA has raised the issue of the integration of the development into the surrounding area.
  • The Glass Bottle development will house ca 9,500 residents, on the doorstep of Irishtown, Ringsend and Sandymount, which combined have a population of ca 17,000. The commercial component of the development could employ somewhere between 5,000 and 10,000 people although it may be at the lower end of that range.
  • The Developer is obliged to build the scheme in accordance with the Poolbeg SDZ Masterplan which was granted Planning Permission in 2019. As such, the extent of housing, commercial and associated services and facilities buildings, carparking and outdoor spaces has been pre-determined. As examples, there is provision for a site for a primary school, a health facility, and a pub. At this time, the Dept of Education have provided no indication as to when they will develop the school.
  • SAMRA, supported by others, has requested that some form of study be carried out to establish if there are shortfalls in the development across social, economic, health, hospitality and other provisions, that might create both demand and opportunities in the surrounding areas. The study would also cover the community gains for the area from facilities to be provided within the development, such as the planned artist studio spaces.
  • Dublin City Council are currently reviewing this request.
  • SAMRA also requested clarity regarding the timeline for the provision of the Luas services to the development. The reply to the Chair of the Forum from the Minister for Transport on 1st Sept 2025 stated that the "development of a Luas red line extension to serve Poolbeg is currently one of the longer-term proposals in the National Transport Authority’s (NTA) Transport Strategy for the Greater Dublin Area, for delivery from 2037-2042. Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) is the Sponsoring Agency for the proposed Luas to Poolbeg project and the NTA is the day-to-day Approving Authority".
  • The Forum is currently challenging this timeline which is seen to be far too long.
April 22, 2026
The Sandymount Bike Week Cycle are holding their 4th Annual Fun Cycle on Sunday 17th May at 11am. There will be a cycle around the Sandymount area, finishing up on Sandymount Green where there will be entertainment and prizes and treats for the kids. The event is suitable for all ages and abilities and no booking is necessary. Any help anyone can give them in promoting the event would be greatly appreciated.
April 21, 2026
April 13, 2026
Fast facts  Raw Sewage outflow occurs across from St Albans/Strand Road 10-12x per year Discharge pumps respond to high water level to avoid flooding at St Albans residential area Raw Sewage released is unfiltered with condoms and sanitary products left deposited on the beach amongst faeces Creates an immediate Public Health Hazard to Dublin Bay Sandymount & Merrion Beach Sandymount & Merrion Beach is used by 100s of walkers, pedestrians per day There is no/inadequate public signage of the hazard There is no clean-up operation triggered by DCC or Irish Water It can take + 2 weeks to clean up after each event Correspondence has been formally exchanged with DCC CEO on incidents dating back to 03/06/2022 c/w photographic evidence of the extent of beach erosion and evidence of health hazard and lack of clean-up A complaint to EPA was formally filed 03/11 2022 with all back-up and Irish Water formally closed out the complaint 16/11/2022 The event of 11/05/2023 carries video evidence of the flow and the aftermath on the beach, widely reported on the media Irish Water are responsible for this system BUT carry no responsibility for Clean Up DCC do not accept responsibility for clean-up below the High Water line and will only clean-up on a limited discretionary requested basis on the Strand There is clear acceptance by our agencies of Dublin City Council and Irish Water of the creation of a Public Health Hazard with no effort made to provide signage or clean-up services It is asserted that Ireland’s agencies including the EPA have become normalised to the acceptance of this status on Ireland’s capital city beach – and are prepared to leave the public at risk to this hazard Notes from meeting with Uisce Eireann, Deputy James Geoghegan TD and SAMRA , 4 TH February 2026 Attendees Deputy James Geoghegan TD SAMRA: David Turner - Chair Karl Anderson - Strategic Communications and Media UISCE EIREANN Steve Seymour – Head of Asset Management Ted O’Reilly – Asset Planning Senior Manager Michael Goss – Wastewater Network Manager AGENDA 1. Extent of Current BioHazard · Number of people, children and pets exposure on the city beach · Raw sewage to beach, media : video, pictures (as per SAMRA website) · Dublin Bay (UNESCO Biosphere and the only associated with a capital city) a previous Blue Flag beach - now the 2nd worst performing in the state 2. What is the Plan to STOP the pollution at St Albans outfall ? Opportunity : Inclusion into the promenade flood alleviation scope 3. Immediately Available Actions to Uisce Éireann Signage Clean-up 4. As the Accountable Agency - WHAT IS Uisce Éireann's Commitment Project Timeline 3 decades on MEETING KEY POINTS James Geoghegan invited SAMRA to overview the context of why we’re here after his challenge to Uisce Eireaann (UE) Sean Laffey in the Dail PAC on 6th November SAMRA overviewed key context points commenting on UE opening slide of a St Albans flooding. The correct priority is in place to pump to the beach rather than flood residential home HOWEVER, the city UNESCO beach has become a toxic place and people, children, dogs are routinely getting sick AND this has been going on for 3 decades - what is UE plan ? UE spent 45 minutes explaining from an engineering perspective, why this a legacy issue and a very complex problem to resolve: development of the hydraulic model drainage area plan (DAP) needed to inform feasibility assessments and decisions: 2 years; due to be complete in 2026 for St Albans area For a 1:5 year storm, containment of St Albans upstream drainage area 45,000 people = 17,000m3 tank (9 Olympic swimming pools) and no identifiable storage site However, to set expectations there are 40-50 DAPs in progress across Ireland Also, to get through to a Capital Funded Plan - minimum 7-10 years (and probably more given the reference of the Blanchardstown plan which took 5 years on a greenfield site outside the complexity of Dublin) UE overviewed what they have/are doing with respect to St Albans: weir to reduce backflow improved pump system at Aylesbury improved telemetry for pump activation annunciation pump performance monitoring to avoid breakdowns DCC beach clean-up service to UE at present and staff will transfer to UE by the end of 2026 - increasing transparency UE response Priorities : response < 4hours for internal flooding to certain premises response < 12 hours for flooding to gardens & streets, etc UE confirmed that the above are all incremental and in reality we have minimum 7-10 years to wait with current status quo, to get to a solution - where residents meanwhile have to cope with toxic conditions We asked questions and discussed : possibility of running an extension pipe across the beach to eliminate the risk whilst engineering is underway in parallel - UE - planning permissions/delays incorporation of a local break tank: volume needed too high and space restrictions incorporation of a line into the upcoming flood defence works - will be explored with OPW and Jacobs exertion of external fines from EU - as with Cork impending, not clear this will make a difference exertion of political pressure - unclear In view of the above, we asked UE to consider how to minimise risk to people whilst the engineering is developed: Communication - there is currently NONE Signage - what is in place is INADEQUATE Clean-up - there is currently LITTLE OR NONE SUMMARY UE presented the complexity of the problem that they have inherited and are working through from an engineering perspective UE did not present any options of what they can do to mitigate risk to people UE did not make any commitments or present any mitigation plan at this meeting BUT they undertook to now consider mitigation options David Turner Chair SAMRA