DUBLIN PORT COMPANY'S 3fm PROJECT
April 2, 2026

Dublin Port Company are planning a €1.1 bn development of their South Port, as the last stage of their overall masterplan for the Port. The project originally included
- New Lo-Lo and Ro-Ro Terminals.
- A large new ship turning area.
- A 3,500 Container Storage area, with containers stacked 3 high and associated craneage, on the inner Sandymount Strand side of the Port.
- A new South Port Access Route, ( SPAR ), linking the North and South Ports including a new bridge across the Liffey, east of the East Link Bridge.
- A Maritime Village.
- Some playing fields and a small park.
PRE-PLANNING CONSULTATIONS WITH SAMRA
- In mid 2023, DPC CEO and his senior officials invited SAMRA to a consultation on their proposals , including, in particular, their proposed Container Storage area.
- We raised a serious concern about this area, pointing out that it would be clearly visible from the Strand, whereas DPC argued that it would not be seen.
- SAMRA commissioned a survey of the area, and a computer generated image of the storage. This clearly demonstrated that the containers would be visible.
- We then organised a very well supported petition calling on DPC to remove this element of their proposal.
- At a further consultation with DPC, they informed SAMRA that they would relocate the storage area to the northside of the development, and would instead use the area as a trailer park. We argued that the area should be used for amenity space including an extension of the Nature Reserve.
PLANNING APPLICATION
- DPC lodged their Application to An Bord Pleanala in mid 2024, which showed the relocation of the Container Storage area, and the trailer park as they had advised to us.
- SAMRA appointed a Planning Consultant, BPS Planning, to prepare a Submission on our behalf. The 87 page Submission, lodged in September 2024, argued strongly against the trailer park on various grounds, calling instead for the Nature Reserve to be extended and the provision of additional amenity facilities. Our Submission also addressed concerns on various other proposals, including the SPAR with a lack of joined up thinking about the cross river Luas, traffic considerations, construction planning, and community gain provisions including poor cycling infrastructure.
- We have since made two further Submissions in 2025 in response to further information lodged by DPC with An Bord Pleanala, ( now An Coimisiun Pleanala ).
- ACP's Decision on the Planning Application is awaited, with no timeframe yet given.

April 22, 2026
The Sandymount Bike Week Cycle are holding their 4th Annual Fun Cycle on Sunday 17th May at 11am. There will be a cycle around the Sandymount area, finishing up on Sandymount Green where there will be entertainment and prizes and treats for the kids. The event is suitable for all ages and abilities and no booking is necessary. Any help anyone can give them in promoting the event would be greatly appreciated.

April 13, 2026
Fast facts Raw Sewage outflow occurs across from St Albans/Strand Road 10-12x per year Discharge pumps respond to high water level to avoid flooding at St Albans residential area Raw Sewage released is unfiltered with condoms and sanitary products left deposited on the beach amongst faeces Creates an immediate Public Health Hazard to Dublin Bay Sandymount & Merrion Beach Sandymount & Merrion Beach is used by 100s of walkers, pedestrians per day There is no/inadequate public signage of the hazard There is no clean-up operation triggered by DCC or Irish Water It can take + 2 weeks to clean up after each event Correspondence has been formally exchanged with DCC CEO on incidents dating back to 03/06/2022 c/w photographic evidence of the extent of beach erosion and evidence of health hazard and lack of clean-up A complaint to EPA was formally filed 03/11 2022 with all back-up and Irish Water formally closed out the complaint 16/11/2022 The event of 11/05/2023 carries video evidence of the flow and the aftermath on the beach, widely reported on the media Irish Water are responsible for this system BUT carry no responsibility for Clean Up DCC do not accept responsibility for clean-up below the High Water line and will only clean-up on a limited discretionary requested basis on the Strand There is clear acceptance by our agencies of Dublin City Council and Irish Water of the creation of a Public Health Hazard with no effort made to provide signage or clean-up services It is asserted that Ireland’s agencies including the EPA have become normalised to the acceptance of this status on Ireland’s capital city beach – and are prepared to leave the public at risk to this hazard Notes from meeting with Uisce Eireann, Deputy James Geoghegan TD and SAMRA , 4 TH February 2026 Attendees Deputy James Geoghegan TD SAMRA: David Turner - Chair Karl Anderson - Strategic Communications and Media UISCE EIREANN Steve Seymour – Head of Asset Management Ted O’Reilly – Asset Planning Senior Manager Michael Goss – Wastewater Network Manager AGENDA 1. Extent of Current BioHazard · Number of people, children and pets exposure on the city beach · Raw sewage to beach, media : video, pictures (as per SAMRA website) · Dublin Bay (UNESCO Biosphere and the only associated with a capital city) a previous Blue Flag beach - now the 2nd worst performing in the state 2. What is the Plan to STOP the pollution at St Albans outfall ? Opportunity : Inclusion into the promenade flood alleviation scope 3. Immediately Available Actions to Uisce Éireann Signage Clean-up 4. As the Accountable Agency - WHAT IS Uisce Éireann's Commitment Project Timeline 3 decades on MEETING KEY POINTS James Geoghegan invited SAMRA to overview the context of why we’re here after his challenge to Uisce Eireaann (UE) Sean Laffey in the Dail PAC on 6th November SAMRA overviewed key context points commenting on UE opening slide of a St Albans flooding. The correct priority is in place to pump to the beach rather than flood residential home HOWEVER, the city UNESCO beach has become a toxic place and people, children, dogs are routinely getting sick AND this has been going on for 3 decades - what is UE plan ? UE spent 45 minutes explaining from an engineering perspective, why this a legacy issue and a very complex problem to resolve: development of the hydraulic model drainage area plan (DAP) needed to inform feasibility assessments and decisions: 2 years; due to be complete in 2026 for St Albans area For a 1:5 year storm, containment of St Albans upstream drainage area 45,000 people = 17,000m3 tank (9 Olympic swimming pools) and no identifiable storage site However, to set expectations there are 40-50 DAPs in progress across Ireland Also, to get through to a Capital Funded Plan - minimum 7-10 years (and probably more given the reference of the Blanchardstown plan which took 5 years on a greenfield site outside the complexity of Dublin) UE overviewed what they have/are doing with respect to St Albans: weir to reduce backflow improved pump system at Aylesbury improved telemetry for pump activation annunciation pump performance monitoring to avoid breakdowns DCC beach clean-up service to UE at present and staff will transfer to UE by the end of 2026 - increasing transparency UE response Priorities : response < 4hours for internal flooding to certain premises response < 12 hours for flooding to gardens & streets, etc UE confirmed that the above are all incremental and in reality we have minimum 7-10 years to wait with current status quo, to get to a solution - where residents meanwhile have to cope with toxic conditions We asked questions and discussed : possibility of running an extension pipe across the beach to eliminate the risk whilst engineering is underway in parallel - UE - planning permissions/delays incorporation of a local break tank: volume needed too high and space restrictions incorporation of a line into the upcoming flood defence works - will be explored with OPW and Jacobs exertion of external fines from EU - as with Cork impending, not clear this will make a difference exertion of political pressure - unclear In view of the above, we asked UE to consider how to minimise risk to people whilst the engineering is developed: Communication - there is currently NONE Signage - what is in place is INADEQUATE Clean-up - there is currently LITTLE OR NONE SUMMARY UE presented the complexity of the problem that they have inherited and are working through from an engineering perspective UE did not present any options of what they can do to mitigate risk to people UE did not make any commitments or present any mitigation plan at this meeting BUT they undertook to now consider mitigation options David Turner Chair SAMRA






